Computing Atlas

How Computing Was Built
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Pioneer

Judea Pearl

Computing Methodologies

Judea Pearl is an Israeli-American electrical engineer, computer scientist and philosopher best known for championing the probabilistic approach to artificial intelligence and developing Bayesian networks, and for a theory of causal and counterfactual inference based on structural models. In 2011 the Association for Computing Machinery awarded him the Turing Award, computer science's highest distinction, for fundamental contributions to artificial intelligence through the development of a calculus for probabilistic and causal reasoning. He is the author of several books, including Causality: Models, Reasoning and Inference and The Book of Why. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/

Facts
Birth Year
1936 1
Birth Date
1936-09-04 2
Award
IEEE Fellow 1
Award
Dickson Prize in Science 1
Award
Foreign Member of the Royal Society 1
Award
Lakatos Award 1
Award
Harvey Prize 1
Award
Turing Award 1
Award
ACM Fellow 1
Award
AAAI Fellow 1
Award
Kampé de Fériet Award 1
Award
Rumelhart Prize 1
Award
ACM-AAAI Allen Newell Award 1
Award
Fellow of the American Academy of Arts and Sciences 1
Award
Honorary doctorate from University of Toronto 1
Award
IJCAI Award for Research Excellence 1
Award
Fellow of the Cognitive Science Society 1
Award
Fellow of the American Statistical Association 1
Award
Benjamin Franklin Medal 1
Connections

Invented By

Judea Pearl developed Bayesian networks as a formalism for probabilistic reasoning, presented in his 1985 paper and 1988 book Probabilistic Reasoning in Intelligent Systems.

In the Other Atlases
Sources
1. Wikidata: Judea Pearl
Wikidata Q92824, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)View the Source
2. Wikipedia: Judea Pearl
Wikimedia FoundationLead section
Quote, Lead section
born September 4, 1936
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.