Proof of authority is a category of blockchain consensus mechanism in which the right to validate transactions and produce blocks rests on the identity and reputation of a limited set of approved validators, rather than on computational work as in proof of work or staked tokens as in proof of stake. The term was coined by Ethereum and Parity Technologies co-founder Gavin Wood. Validators are granted their role by a centralized authority, a council, or a decentralized organization, and are expected to behave honestly because misconduct damages their public reputation and can cost them their validator status. Because it is permissioned and relies on a comparatively small number of trusted validators rather than a fully trustless open network, proof of authority can process transactions faster and with less computational overhead than proof of work or proof of stake; blockchain platforms reported to use it include VeChain, Bitgert, Palm Network and Xodex. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Connections
In Field
Source Wikipedia: Proof of authority
Sources
Wikipedia: Proof of authority
Lead section
Proof of authority (PoA) is a category of consensus protocols used with blockchains based on reputation and identity as a stake that delivers comparatively fast and efficient transactions (compared to proof-of-work and proof-of-stake).
In Field: Blockchain, Lead sentence
Proof of authority (PoA) is a category of consensus protocols used with blockchains based on reputation and identity as a stake that delivers comparatively fast and efficient transactions (compared to proof-of-work and proof-of-stake).
In Group: Blockchain Consensus Mechanisms, Lead
Proof of authority (PoA) is a category of consensus protocols used with blockchains based on reputation and identity as a stake that delivers comparatively fast and efficient transactions (compared to proof-of-work and proof-of-stake).
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.