Home›Object-Oriented Language›LicenseBrowse ByLicenseThis dimension groups programming languages by the license under which their implementation is released. Wikipedia notes that running a language requires "an implementation," and that implementation is released to the public under one specific license. Browsing this way collects every language released under the same license.FactsLicenseSourcesComments (0)Reader Challenges (0)FactsComparisonEra of EmergenceWell-attested1961 CE 1LicenseFilter Results9 entriesParadigmAllC-Family Object-Oriented Languages (5)Object-Oriented Languages on the .NET Platform (2)Smalltalk-Derived Languages (3)First ReleasedAll1988 (1)1995 (1)1996 (2)1999 (1)2000 (1)2001 (3)2002 (2)2003 (2)2006 (2)2008 (1)2011 (2)2014 (2)Typing DisciplineAllDuck Typing (2)Dynamic Typing (4)Static Typing (6)Strong Typing (5)Invented ByAllAnders Hejlsberg (1)Benoît Minisini (1)Charles Esterbrook (1)Gavin Wood (1)Lars Bak (1)Yukihiro Matsumoto (1)Invented By CompanyAllGoogle (1)Guidewire Software (1)Microsoft (2)TIBCO Software (1)LineageAllBoo (programming language) (1)C# (1)C++ (3)Common Lisp (1)D (1)Java (1)JavaScript (1)Lisp (1)Lua (1)Perl (2)Python (2)Ruby (1)Smalltalk (3)PredecessorAllSmalltalk (1)Visual Basic (1)ACM AreaAllProgramming Language Theory (8)Software Engineering (2)Origin YearAll1991 (1)1999 (1)2004 (1)2007 (1)Show ResultsBrowseCompareApache License 2.0License6 entriesBSD 2-Clause LicenseLicense1 entryBSD 3-Clause LicenseLicense3 entriesEclipse Public License 2.0License1 entryGNU General Public License Version 2License1 entryGNU General Public License Version 3License1 entryGNU Lesser General Public License Version 2.1License1 entryMIT LicenseLicense3 entriesProprietary SoftwareLicense2 entriesSources1. Wikipedia: Object-oriented programmingtier 2WikipediaObject-oriented programming, History sectionQuote, Object-oriented programming, History sectionMeanwhile, in Norway, Simula was developed during the years 1961-1967.View the SourceComments (0)No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.Sign in to join the discussion.Reader Challenges (0)No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.