Computing Atlas

How Computing Was Built
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
System

CDC 6400

Mainframe Family

The CDC 6400 was a mainframe computer from Control Data Corporation and a member of the CDC 6000 series, the family of large solid-state, general-purpose digital computers that also included the 6200, 6300, 6500, 6600 and 6700. It was delivered in April 1966, after the flagship CDC 6600 of 1964. The 6400 has a single central processor with the same instruction set as the 6600, but its single unified arithmetic function unit can only carry out one instruction at a time, which makes it a slower and less expensive serial implementation than the 6600's ten parallel functional units. All other aspects of the machine were identical to the 6600, including the ten peripheral processors that handle input and output and the 60-bit central memory word. Like the rest of the series it ran under the SCOPE operating system, and by 1970 also the time-sharing oriented KRONOS. The CDC 6500 combined two 6400 central processors, and the 6700 paired a 6400-style processor with a 6600-style one.

Facts
Status
Status
Discontinued 1
Year
1966 1
Connections

In Field

Source CDC 6000 series (Wikipedia)

Invented By

Source CDC 6000 series (Wikipedia)
Seymour Cray, Pioneers
Source CDC 6000 series (Wikipedia)

Long-Form Articles

In the Other Atlases

Developed By

Also in Business Atlas: the developer of this subject.

Source CDC 6000 series (Wikipedia)Lead
Quote, Lead
The CDC 6000 series is a discontinued family of mainframe computers manufactured by Control Data Corporation in the 1960s.
Sources
1. CDC 6000 series (Wikipedia)
  • History
    The next system to be introduced was the CDC 6400, delivered in April 1966.
  • Lead
    The CDC 6000 series is a discontinued family of mainframe computers manufactured by Control Data Corporation in the 1960s.
  • In Field: Computer Architecture, Overview
    The 6000 series has a distributed architecture.
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.