Computing Atlas

How Computing Was Built
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
System

ORVYL and WYLBUR

Operating System

ORVYL is a time-sharing monitor developed by Stanford University for IBM System/360 and System/370 computers, first running in 1967 and 1968. It was one of the first time-sharing systems made available for IBM mainframes, letting multiple interactive users share a single machine rather than submitting jobs in batches. Wylbur is a companion text editor and word processor written to work either together with ORVYL or on its own. Both were written in 360/370 assembly language, ran on IBM S/360 and S/370 systems and their successors, and were eventually discontinued; the earliest versions were distributed as open source before later editions moved to proprietary licensing terms.

Facts
Classification
License
Public Domain 1
License
Proprietary (Closed Source) 1
Year
1967 1
Significance
One of the first time-sharing systems made available for IBM computers. 1
Status
Status
Discontinued 1
FAQs

Is WYLBUR an operating system?

No. It runs on top of an IBM batch operating system.

Not a full one. WYLBUR is not a full standalone operating system in the mold of the Dartmouth Time-Sharing System or Unix. Instead it runs on top of an IBM batch operating system such as OS/360, SVS or MVS.
Connections

Licensed Under

Sources
1. ORVYL and WYLBUR (Wikipedia)
  • Infobox: released
    1967, 1968
  • Infobox, Working state
    Discontinued
  • Infobox, License
    Originally public domain; the later proprietary versions had distinct licenses
  • Infobox: license
    Originally public domain; the later proprietary versions had distinct licenses
  • Lead paragraph
    ORVYL was one of the first time-sharing systems to be made available for IBM computers.
  • In Group: Research and Academic Operating Systems, developed by Stanford University time-sharing monitor for IBM System/360 and System/370
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.