Visual J++ was Microsoft's implementation of the Java language, introduced in 1996 and discontinued in January 2004. Its syntax, reserved words and grammar conventions were the same as Java's, but Microsoft's runtime, the MSJVM, did not pass Sun Microsystems' compliance tests, which led Sun, Java's creator, to sue. J++ left out parts of Sun's platform such as Remote Method Invocation and the Java Native Interface, and added extensions of its own, including callbacks and delegates for event handling, the J/Direct mechanism for reaching the Win32 interface directly, and the Windows Foundation Classes library for building graphical interfaces on Windows. The name also covered the integrated development environment that shipped in the Visual Studio product line, where version 6.0 was the last release to include it. A 2004 settlement froze J++ at the feature set of Java version 1.1.4, which effectively ended its updates. Its technology survived for a while as part of the .NET platform and the J# language.
Facts
First Released Visual J++
Filter Results1 entry
Connections
In Field
Source Visual J++ (Wikipedia)
Influenced
Source Visual J++ (Wikipedia)
Predecessor Of
Source Visual J++ (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases
Developed By
Also in Business Atlas: the developer of this subject.
Source Visual J++ (Wikipedia)Lead, developerQuote, Lead, developer
Visual J++ is Microsoft's discontinued implementation of Java.
Sources
1. Visual J++ (Wikipedia)
Lead, introduction
It was introduced in 1996 and discontinued in January 2004
Lead, developer
Visual J++ is Microsoft's discontinued implementation of Java.
In Field: Programming Language Theory, Lead, implementation of Java
Visual J++ is Microsoft's discontinued implementation of Java.
Predecessor Of: J#, Lead, successors
replaced to a certain extent by J# and C#
Influenced: J#, Sun litigation, technology recycled
The technology of J++ was eventually recycled, surviving for a while as part of the Microsoft .NET platform and the J# programming language.
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.