CP/M-86 was a version of Digital Research's CP/M operating system, built by the company founded by Gary Kildall and led on this project with Kathryn Strutynski, for the Intel 8086 and 8088 processors used in early x86 based computers. Announced for a November 1979 release but repeatedly delayed, it first shipped in November 1981 for the IBM Displaywriter, with a version for the IBM PC following in spring 1982; it extended the earlier 8 bit CP/M-80 to 16 bit hardware while keeping similar system commands and a relocatable .CMD executable format. IBM initially preferred CP/M-86 for its new PC because of CP/M's large existing software library, but licensing negotiations between IBM and Digital Research broke down, and IBM launched the PC with MS-DOS as its primary system, offering CP/M-86 only as a costlier alternative; one contemporary survey found 96.3 percent of IBM PCs were ordered with DOS against 3.4 percent with CP/M-86. This description is adapted from Wikipedia contributors under CC BY-SA 4.0; changes were made. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-sa/4.0/
Facts
Classification
LicenseProprietary (Closed Source) 2 Connections
In Field
Source Wikipedia: CP/M-86
Licensed Under
Entity-backed identity for the license enum value this item already carries, resolved to a software license concept by an explicit value-to-entity map (phase 3 bucket conversion, docs\design_entity_backed_browse_buckets_20260928.md). The license fact itself stays on the item unchanged.
Sources
1. Wikipedia: CP/M-86
Infobox
=
In Field: Operating Systems, Lead sentence
CP/M-86 is a discontinued version of the CP/M operating system that Digital Research (DR) made for the Intel 8086 and Intel 8088. The system commands are the same as in CP/M-80. Executable files used the relocatable .CMD file format.
View the Source2. Wikidata: CP/M-86
- Wikidata Q2706791, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)
- Wikidata Q2706791 P571 (inception)
- Wikidata Q2706791 P275 (license)
View the SourceReader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.