Computing Atlas

How Computing Was Built
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
Programming Language

FoxPro

Procedural Language

FoxPro was a text-based, procedurally oriented programming language and database management system that also supported object-oriented programming. It was first published by Fox Software and later by Microsoft, which acquired Fox Software in 1992, and it ran on MS-DOS, Windows, Macintosh and Unix. FoxPro descended from FoxBase, which in turn descended from dBase III and dBase II. It handled multiple relationships between several dbf table files, though it lacked transactional processing, and FoxPro 2 introduced the Rushmore engine, which used indexes to speed up data retrieval and updating. The last published release was 2.6, and development continued under the Visual FoxPro name until that product was discontinued in 2007.

Facts
Paradigm
Object-oriented 1
Paradigm
Procedural 1
Connections

In Field

Source FoxPro (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Developed By

Also in Business Atlas: the developer of this subject.

Source FoxPro (Wikipedia)Description
Quote, Description
FoxPro was derived from FoxBase (Fox Software, Perrysburg, Ohio)
Sources
1. FoxPro (Wikipedia)
  • Lead, object-oriented
    FoxPro is a text-based procedurally oriented programming language and database management system (DBMS), and it is also an object-oriented programming language
  • Description
    FoxPro was derived from FoxBase (Fox Software, Perrysburg, Ohio)
  • In Group: Business and Data Processing Languages, Lead
    FoxPro is a text-based procedurally oriented programming language and database management system (DBMS), and it is also an object-oriented programming language
  • In Field: Programming Language Theory, Lead, field
    FoxPro is a text-based procedurally oriented programming language and database management system (DBMS), and it is also an object-oriented programming language
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.