SNOBOL (StriNg Oriented and symBOlic Language) is a series of programming languages developed between 1962 and 1967 at Bell Labs by David Farber, Ralph Griswold and Ivan Polonsky, designed for string manipulation and pattern matching, with SNOBOL4 the most widely used version. SNOBOL4 differs from most programming languages in that its fundamental data-matching operations are pattern matching, and it was widely used through the 1970s for text processing before its designer moved on to develop the successor language Icon.
Facts
First Released ParadigmImperative, procedural, unstructured 2 SignificanceSNOBOL4 was widely taught at American universities and became a common text manipulation language in the humanities during the 1970s and 1980s. 2 Connections
In Field
Source SNOBOL - Wikipedia
Influenced
Invented By
Predecessor Of
In the Other Atlases
Developed By
Also in Business Atlas: the developer of this subject.
Sources
1. Wikidata: SNOBOL
- Wikidata Q522041, class allow-list match (w-wdresolver-0926)
- Wikidata Q522041 P571 (inception)
View the Source2. SNOBOL - Wikipedia
Infobox: year
1962
Infobox: paradigm
Imperative, procedural, unstructured
Lead paragraph
SNOBOL4 was quite widely taught in larger U.S. universities in the late 1960s and early 1970s and was widely used in the 1970s and 1980s as a text manipulation language in the humanities.
In Field: Programming Language Theory, Lead sentence
SNOBOL (StriNg Oriented and symBOlic Language) is a series of programming languages developed between 1962 and 1967 at AT&T Bell Laboratories by David J. Farber, Ralph Griswold and Ivan P. Polonsky, culminating in SNOBOL4. It was one of a number of text-string
In Group: List and String Processing Languages, Lead
SNOBOL (StriNg Oriented and symBOlic Language) is a series of programming languages developed between 1962 and 1967 at AT&T Bell Laboratories by David J. Farber, Ralph Griswold and Ivan P. Polonsky, culminating in SNOBOL4.
View the SourceWikidata: Icon
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.
Sign in to dispute this or suggest a correction.