Computing Atlas

How Computing Was Built
Sign In
Text size
100%
Theme
System

HITAC S-3000

Supercomputer

The HITAC S-3000 was a family of vector supercomputers that Hitachi developed, manufactured and marketed, announced in April 1992 as the successor to the HITAC S-820. The family had two parts. The low-end and mid-range S-3600 models were an improved S-820 built in more modern semiconductor technology, while the high-end S-3800 models were a new design: a parallel vector processor that supported one to four vector processors. Unlike Hitachi's earlier supercomputers, the S-3000 family was marketed outside Japan. Its CPU architecture was based on IBM System/370 and was compatible with Hitachi's mainframe systems, and it supported two operating systems, OSF/1 Unix and Hitachi's own VOS3, a fork of IBM MVS. In 1994 the family gained a massively parallel companion, the SR2001, which used superscalar microprocessors, and Hitachi later gave up vector supercomputers in favour of that approach. The S-3000 family was replaced in 2000 by the SR8000, which made it Hitachi's last vector supercomputer.

Facts
Status
Status
Discontinued 1
Year
1992 1
Connections

In Field

Source HITAC S-3000 (Wikipedia)
In the Other Atlases

Developed By

Also in Business Atlas: the developer of this subject.

Source HITAC S-3000 (Wikipedia)Lead paragraph [invented-by-company]
Quote, Lead paragraph [invented-by-company]
developed, manufactured and marketed by Hitachi
Sources
1. HITAC S-3000 (Wikipedia)
  • Lead paragraph, announcement
    Announced in April 1992
  • Lead paragraph, replacement
    The S-3000 family was replaced in 2000 by the SR8000
  • Lead paragraph [invented-by-company]
    developed, manufactured and marketed by Hitachi
  • In Group: Mainframe and Historical Systems, Lead paragraph
    The HITAC S-3000 is a former family of vector supercomputers
  • In Field: Computer Architecture, Final paragraph, CPU architecture
    The CPU architecture of HITACHI S-3800 Series was based on IBM System/370
View the Source
Comments (0)
No comments yet. Be the first to share a thought.
Reader Challenges (0)
No disputes yet. Spotted an error or a better source? Open the first one.